Built for

SAP process owners and IT decision-makers seeking alternatives to Celonis for SAP process mining and analysis

Decision supported

Choosing a process intelligence platform alternative to Celonis that integrates with SAP and supports governed ERP modernization

Decision context

Celonis is a leading process mining platform widely used for analyzing and optimizing business processes, including those running on SAP. However, organizations seeking alternatives often require solutions that integrate more deeply with SAP’s ERP modernization needs, providing evidence-based insights and governance capabilities beyond standard process mining.

A Celonis alternative for SAP should ingest diverse SAP-specific evidence such as ABAP code readiness, ATC results, data quality metrics, and connector statuses. It must support detailed dependency mapping and decision workflows for keep/replace/remediate/retire strategies, which are critical for SAP change governance and modernization projects.

This comparison page evaluates alternatives to Celonis focusing on their ability to handle SAP-specific evidence, support governance workflows, generate implementation packages, and coordinate cutover and reconciliation. It highlights operational capabilities, evidence requirements, and procurement considerations for SAP-centric process intelligence platforms.

Integration with SAP Evidence Sources

A key differentiator for Celonis alternatives in SAP environments is the ability to ingest and correlate multiple SAP evidence types. This includes authorized SAP readiness checks, ABAP Test Cockpit (ATC) results, ABAP and DDIC code analysis, abapGit repositories, and process-event logs.

Effective alternatives provide comprehensive visibility into SAP system health and change impact by combining these inputs. They also report coverage gaps and unsupported inputs to ensure no critical data is overlooked during process analysis and modernization planning.

Ingest SAP readiness and ATC results for code quality assessment
Analyze ABAP and DDIC objects alongside abapGit source control
Correlate process-event and requirement evidence for end-to-end insights

Governed ERP Modernization Workflows

Unlike generic process mining tools, SAP-focused alternatives support governance workflows tailored to ERP modernization. This includes mapping observed and inferred dependencies among SAP components and enabling keep, replace, remediate, or retire decisions.

These platforms generate reviewable code and data proposals, create content-addressed implementation packages, and identify impacted tests. They also record human approvals and coordinate cutover, reconciliation, continuity, and exact-state recovery to reduce risk during SAP change projects.

Dependency mapping for SAP components and processes
Decision support for keep/replace/remediate/retire strategies
Implementation package generation with test impact analysis

Data Security and Customer Infrastructure Control

A critical consideration when evaluating Celonis alternatives for SAP is data security and control. Leading alternatives allow signed customer operators to retain raw service data, source code, and credentials within their own infrastructure.

Only bounded commands, hashes, aggregate outcomes, compile/runtime/test receipts, and reconciliation evidence are returned externally. This approach minimizes data exposure and aligns with SAP customers’ stringent security and compliance requirements.

Keep raw SAP data and credentials inside customer infrastructure
Return only bounded commands and aggregate evidence externally
Support signed operator workflows for secure data handling

Process Variant and Bottleneck Analysis

Alternatives to Celonis for SAP often include advanced process capabilities such as observed variant detection, bottleneck identification, and immutable simulations. These features help organizations understand process deviations and performance constraints within SAP landscapes.

Improvement history tracking enables continuous monitoring of process changes and their impact, supporting ongoing SAP process optimization and modernization efforts.

Detect and analyze observed process variants in SAP workflows
Identify bottlenecks affecting SAP process performance
Run immutable simulations to predict change outcomes

Reporting and Visibility of Unsupported Inputs

Transparent reporting is essential for SAP process intelligence. Alternatives to Celonis provide detailed reports on coverage and unsupported inputs, ensuring decision-makers are aware of data gaps or limitations in analysis.

This transparency supports risk management and prioritization during SAP modernization, helping avoid surprises from hidden dependencies or missing evidence.

Detailed coverage reports highlighting data completeness
Visibility into unsupported or missing SAP inputs
Risk-aware prioritization based on evidence gaps

How to compare the products

Multi-source SAP Evidence Ingestion. Supports ingestion of diverse SAP evidence types including readiness checks, ATC, ABAP/DDIC code, abapGit repositories, and process-event logs for comprehensive analysis.
Governed ERP Modernization Support. Enables mapping of dependencies and decision workflows for keep/replace/remediate/retire strategies, generating implementation packages and coordinating cutover and reconciliation.
Secure Customer Infrastructure Operation. Allows signed customer operators to retain raw data and credentials internally, returning only bounded commands and aggregate evidence externally to maintain data security.
Process Variant and Bottleneck Analysis. Detects observed process variants and bottlenecks within SAP workflows and supports immutable simulations to predict effects of changes.
Comprehensive Reporting and Transparency. Generates detailed reports on data coverage and unsupported inputs, enhancing visibility and risk management during SAP process intelligence initiatives.
Approval and Change Coordination. Records human approvals and coordinates continuity and exact-state recovery to ensure controlled and auditable SAP change management.

Implementation workflow

Start with a bounded customer scenario and explicit acceptance criteria. Preserve native SAP permissions and accountable review while the software creates a repeatable evidence chain.

Collect authorized SAP readiness, ATC, ABAP, DDIC, abapGit, process-event, requirement, data-quality, and connector evidence from SAP systems.
Ingest and correlate evidence to map observed and inferred dependencies among SAP components and processes.
Analyze coverage and identify unsupported inputs, generating detailed reports for stakeholder review.
Support keep/replace/remediate/retire decision workflows with reviewable code and data proposals.
Generate content-addressed implementation packages and identify impacted tests for change validation.
Record human approvals and coordinate cutover, reconciliation, continuity, and exact-state recovery activities.
Monitor process variants, bottlenecks, and improvement history to support ongoing SAP process optimization.

Evidence to require

A transformation claim should resolve to observable artifacts, decisions, and execution receipts. Ask for the following evidence in a representative evaluation:

Authorized SAP readiness check reports
ABAP Test Cockpit (ATC) scan results
ABAP and DDIC code analysis outputs
abapGit source control repositories
Process-event and requirement logs
Data quality and connector status reports
Implementation package manifests and hashes
Compile, runtime, and test receipts
Human approval records
Cutover and reconciliation logs

Boundaries and non-claims

Adranum separates analysis, proposal, human review, package creation, customer-local validation, and production execution. A later state never rewrites the evidence that supported an earlier decision.

Does not replace SAP licensing or Basis administration responsibilities.
Generated code proposals require customer-controlled compilation and runtime validation.
Missing or unsupported inputs remain visible and may limit analysis completeness.
Not a substitute for specialized SAP testing tools in all scenarios.

Public comparison sources

Competitor statements are limited to current public materials. Verify them during procurement because products and packaging change.

Buyer checklist

Which SAP evidence types are supported for ingestion and analysis?
How does the platform map and visualize dependencies among SAP components?
What governance workflows are provided for ERP modernization decisions?
How is data security maintained, especially regarding customer infrastructure?
What reporting capabilities exist for unsupported or missing inputs?
Can the platform generate implementation packages and coordinate cutover activities?
How are process variants and bottlenecks detected and reported?
What human approval and audit trail features are included?

Practical answers

Can this alternative integrate with SAP’s ABAP Test Cockpit?

Yes, it ingests ATC results to assess code quality and readiness within SAP environments.

Does the platform keep sensitive SAP data within customer infrastructure?

Yes, signed customer operators retain raw data and credentials internally, minimizing external exposure.

Are generated code proposals ready for direct deployment?

No, generated proposals require customer-controlled compilation and runtime validation before deployment.

How does the platform handle missing or unsupported SAP inputs?

It reports these transparently to ensure visibility of data gaps that may affect analysis completeness.

Does it support approval workflows for SAP change governance?

Yes, it records human approvals and coordinates cutover and reconciliation activities for controlled change management.

Celonis Alternative For SAP: Buyer Evaluation Guide